We know times are hard unless you were skeevy enough to have Madoff with a shit-ton of loot last year. Pay thru March, Tor(rent) up, or just boot off the neighbors for a few days. You must. not. miss. the HBO premiere of Death on a Factory Farm on March 16.


Over the next 10 years Smithfield Foods, the largest pork producer in the US will phase out the use of gestation crates, restraint devices used in the pork industry to severely restrict the movement of pregnant gilts and sows, and which house them throughout their pregnancies of just under four months. Gestational housing of this type is the underpinning of “modern” pig farming that permits the concentration of tens of thousands of animals—and their waste products—in a single facility and a minor reduction in the number of newborn and infant piglets lost to accidental crushing or suffocation by their mother.

Two items notable by their absence from this announcement need a bit more clarification: the company’s release makes no mention of the phase-out of farrowing crates; gestation crates and farrowing crates are not the same thing. We’re saying it one more time for the back rows and balcony: gestation crates and farrowing crates are not the same thing.

While they both derive from the same perspective (production “efficiency”), serve the same physical function (severe restriction of animal movement), and may be identical in physical design (components and cubic feet), they do not serve the same operational function. Ask repeatedly and with insistence on a definitive answer and you’ll finally get that distinction out in the open.

Could a sow spend three months of her life in an unbedded, indoor-only, communal group pen then wind up back in the same crate she was in the year before the phase-out, spend three weeks there with her piglets, be removed to group housing for 21 days, re-artificially inseminated, and start the whole process over again? Yeah, but you’d have to account for the white space in the Smithfield release and statements to get to that scenario and it’s not one we’re making as a far-fetched assumption.

We find it more than a bit ironic that the company’s position today is this u-turn in both practical husbandry and operational philosophy “will not have a detrimental effect on our animals,” as the pork production industry has built its post-WWII mantra on the specious assertion of group and/or loose housing as antithetical to the health and safety of naturally competitive and rambunctious gilts and sows.

While we applaud this decision by one of the world’s largest food conglomerates, we can’t help but wonder if this is a defensive position taken in reaction to the overwhelming groundswell of citizen initiative and backlash against the rationalization that putting a 500 lb. animal, comparatively a teenager, in a 7×2’ steel and concrete living space for the length of her life means more consumer purchasing power, thereby more consumer choice, hence more freedom.

Yes, freedom has a price. Yes, those who purchase the pork industry’s products have demonstrated time and dollar-again that they are willing to pay those few extra pennies per pound to let another creature take more than two steps forward or backward in life. Yes, it took hundreds of millions of lives wretchedly abused, tortured from birth to death, discarded and then forgotten, plus a few short years of in-house, purely science-based research, for the industry to arrive at the conclusion that a pig is still a pig, and they can make of her nothing more nor less.

Related entries.

aldf_logo_new

The Animal Legal Defense Fund has filed suit to put an end to the illegal confinement of thousands of pregnant and nursing sows at California’s CorcPork, Inc.

corcpork_map

It just keeps getting better. This isn’t CorcPork, Inc.’s first time in the hot-seat, either. And wtf are those big, black spots on that map, anyway? And the long metal structures? Those would be the “barns.” We just figured something out: if you lined up all the crates housing all the units of industrial animal production piglet-making equipment in the US end-to-end, they would stretch from LA to Montreal and back again, with enough miles left over for a road trip to Chicago.
000_101720031014_cr

She can never stretch.

Subtract the minute, fractional percentage of breeding sows in the US who don’t “live” like this from the 6,060,000 who do, then just work the 2–step math problem like we did.
One metal container, 22×84 inches
6,060,000 mothers
1 mile=63,360 inches

Our take give on the pending ALDF case:

aldf_donation

Question? In the back?

February 23, 2006

0006003

So crowded, it’s hard to hear. But that’s OK, just speak up.

0004001

Don’t be embarrassed, no one will laugh at you. Or denigrate you. Or dismiss you, alienate you, penalize you. You’re safe here.

101920031051

They’re not.

0010

And that’s a crime.